The letter from the National Archives indicates that Trump’s legal team was aware as early as April that the FBI was eager to obtain the documents so that they could do a damage assessment to determine whether there was any fallout related to their mishandling. But man, at some point, how do you decline to charge him when his conduct has been so egregious?” “And charging him is not an easy decision. We’re going to declare victory and go home,’” she added. And I think it becomes much more difficult for the Justice Department to simply say, ‘We’ve got documents back. “When you have 300 of them, and you retain them for over a year after repeated requests, and they come down a few times, and you still have them - it seems that the case has become much stronger. attorney, noting that the charges being weighed by the government require showing intent.
“The volume of the documents and the length of the dispute, I think, makes the case stronger for the government that Donald Trump’s retention of these documents was willful,” said Barbara McQuade, a former U.S. ( The Hill) - Former President Donald Trump’s resistance to turning over what now appears to be a much larger tranche of documents than previously known could strengthen a potential case from the Justice Department against him and renews questions over whether the delay harmed national security.Ī letter released by the National Archives on Tuesday indicates that an initial batch of 15 boxes of documents taken from Mar-a-Lago in January included 100 classified documents totaling 700 pages.Īnd reporting from The New York Times late Monday indicates that the government has recovered at least 300 classified documents from Trump since he left office.īoth offer insight into the volume of documents Trump took with him as he left office.īut the letter from the National Archives also shows the resistance Trump’s team had to any members of the intelligence community reviewing the documents so they could begin to assess whether there was damage done to any national security partners or methods.
0 kommentar(er)
